Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The quantum mechanics of particles in a periodic potential: Bloch’s theorem, Study notes of Solid State Physics

You will learn about Bloch’s theorem using given solutions.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

eklavya
eklavya 🇺🇸

4.5

(22)

266 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Handout 2
The quantum mechanics of particles
in a periodic potential: Bloch’s
theorem
2.1 Introduction and health warning
We are going to set up the formalism for dealing with a periodic potential; this is known as Bloch’s
theorem. The next two-three lectures are going to appear to be hard work from a conceptual point of
view. However, although the algebra looks complicated, the underlying ideas are really quite simple;
you should be able to reproduce the various derivations yourself (make good notes!).
I am going to justify the Bloch theorem fairly rigorously. This formalism will then be used to treat
two opposite limits, a very weak periodic potential and a potential which is so strong that the electrons
can hardly move. You will see that both limits give qualitatively similar answers, i.e. reality, which lies
somewhere in between, must also be like this!
For this part of the course these notes provide a slightly different (Fourier) approach to the results
that I will derive in the lectures. I recommend that you work through and understand both methods,
as the Bloch theorem forms the foundation on which the rest of the course is based.
2.2 Introducing the periodic potential
We have been treating the electrons as totally free. We now introduce a periodic potential V(r). The
underlying translational periodicity of the lattice is defined by the primitive lattice translation vectors
T=n1a1+n2a2+n3a3,(2.1)
where n1,n2and n3are integers and a1,a2and a3are three noncoplanar vectors. 1Now V(r) must
be periodic, i.e.
V(r+T) = V(r).(2.2)
The periodic nature of V(r) also implies that the potential may be expressed as a Fourier series
V(r) = X
G
VGeiG.r,(2.3)
where the Gare a set of vectors and the VGare Fourier coefficients.2
Equations 2.2 and 2.3 imply that
eiG.T= 1,i.e.G.T= 2pπ, (2.4)
1See Introduction to Solid State Physics, by Charles Kittel, seventh edition (Wiley, New York 1996) pages 4-7.
2Notice that the units of Gare the same as those of the wavevector kof a particle; |k|= 2π/λ, where λis the de
Broglie wavelength. The Gare vectors in k-space.
15
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download The quantum mechanics of particles in a periodic potential: Bloch’s theorem and more Study notes Solid State Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Handout 2

The quantum mechanics of particles

in a periodic potential: Bloch’s

theorem

2.1 Introduction and health warning

We are going to set up the formalism for dealing with a periodic potential; this is known as Bloch’s theorem. The next two-three lectures are going to appear to be hard work from a conceptual point of view. However, although the algebra looks complicated, the underlying ideas are really quite simple; you should be able to reproduce the various derivations yourself (make good notes!). I am going to justify the Bloch theorem fairly rigorously. This formalism will then be used to treat two opposite limits, a very weak periodic potential and a potential which is so strong that the electrons can hardly move. You will see that both limits give qualitatively similar answers, i.e. reality, which lies somewhere in between, must also be like this! For this part of the course these notes provide a slightly different (Fourier) approach to the results that I will derive in the lectures. I recommend that you work through and understand both methods, as the Bloch theorem forms the foundation on which the rest of the course is based.

2.2 Introducing the periodic potential

We have been treating the electrons as totally free. We now introduce a periodic potential V (r). The underlying translational periodicity of the lattice is defined by the primitive lattice translation vectors

T = n 1 a 1 + n 2 a 2 + n 3 a 3 , (2.1)

where n 1 , n 2 and n 3 are integers and a 1 , a 2 and a 3 are three noncoplanar vectors. 1 Now V (r) must be periodic, i.e. V (r + T) = V (r). (2.2)

The periodic nature of V (r) also implies that the potential may be expressed as a Fourier series

V (r) =

G

VGeiG.r, (2.3)

where the G are a set of vectors and the VG are Fourier coefficients.^2 Equations 2.2 and 2.3 imply that

eiG.T^ = 1, i.e. G.T = 2pπ, (2.4) (^1) See Introduction to Solid State Physics, by Charles Kittel, seventh edition (Wiley, New York 1996) pages 4-7. (^2) Notice that the units of G are the same as those of the wavevector k of a particle; |k| = 2π/λ, where λ is the de Broglie wavelength. The G are vectors in k-space.

16 HANDOUT 2. THE QUANTUM MECHANICS OF PARTICLES IN A PERIODIC POTENTIAL: BLOCH’S THEOREM

E E

(^0) k -2G -G 0 G k

Figure 2.1: The effect of introducing the reciprocal lattice; instead of dealing with just one electron dispersion relationship (left) we have an infinite number of copies (right).

where p is an integer. As T = n 1 a 1 + n 2 a 2 + n 3 a 3 , this implies that

G = m 1 A 1 + m 2 A 2 + m 3 A 3 , (2.5)

where the mj are integers, and the Aj are three noncoplanar vectors defined by

aj .Al = 2πδjl. (2.6)

Take a few moments to convince yourself that this is the only way of defining G which can satisfy Equation 2.4 for all possible T. Using very simple reasoning, we have shown that the existence of a lattice in r-space automatically implies the existence of a lattice in k-space. The vectors G define the reciprocal lattice; the Aj are its primitive translation vectors. The reciprocal lattice has extraordinary consequences for the electronic motion, even before we “switch on” the lattice potential. Instead of dealing with just one electron dispersion relationship E(k) there must be an infinite number of equivalent dispersion relationships (see Figure 2.1) such that E(k) = E(k + G) for all G (c.f. Equation 2.2). However, the k-space periodicity also implies that all information will be contained in the primitive unit cell of the reciprocal lattice, known as the first Brillouin zone.^3 The first Brillouin zone has a k-space volume

Vk 3 = A 1 .A 2 × A 3. (2.7)

2.3 Born–von Karman boundary conditions

We need to derive a suitable set of functions with which we can describe the motion of the electrons through the periodic potential; “motion” implies that we do not want standing waves. The functions should reflect the translational symmetry properties of the lattice; to do this we use Born–von Karman periodic boundary conditions. We choose a plane wave φ(r) = ei(k.r−ωt)^ (2.8)

subject to boundary conditions which include the symmetry of the crystal

φ(r + Nj aj ) = φ(r), (2.9)

where j = 1, 2 , 3 and N = N 1 N 2 N 3 is the number of primitive unit cells in the crystal; Nj is the number of unit cells in the jth direction. The boundary condition (Equation 2.9) implies that

eiNj^ k.aj^ = 1 (2.10)

for j = 1, 2 , 3. Comparing this with Equation 2.4 (and the discussion that follows it) suggests that the allowed wavevectors are

k =

∑^3

j=

mj Nj

Aj. (2.11)

(^3) The first Brillouin zone is the Wigner-Seitz primitive cell of the reciprocal lattice.See Solid State Physics, by G. Burns (Academic Press, Boston, 1995) Section 10.6 or Introduction to Solid State Physics, by Charles Kittel, seventh edition (Wiley, New York 1996) Chapter 2.

18 HANDOUT 2. THE QUANTUM MECHANICS OF PARTICLES IN A PERIODIC POTENTIAL: BLOCH’S THEOREM

As the Born-von Karman plane waves are an orthogonal set of functions, the coefficient of each term in the sum must vanish (one can prove this by multiplying by a plane wave and integrating), i.e.

( ¯h^2 k^2 2 m

− E

Ck +

G

VGCk−G = 0. (2.21)

(Note that we get the Sommerfeld result if we set VG = 0.) It is going to be convenient to deal just with solutions in the first Brillouin zone (we have already seen that this contains all useful information about k-space). So, we write k = (q − G′), where q lies in the first Brillouin zone and G′^ is a reciprocal lattice vector. Equation 2.21 can then be rewritten

( ¯h^2 (q − G′)^2 2 m

− E

Cq−G′^ +

G

VGCq−G′−G = 0. (2.22)

Finally, we change variables so that G′′^ → G + G′, leaving the equation of coefficients in the form

( ¯h^2 (q − G′)^2 2 m

− E

Cq−G′ +

G′′

VG′′−G′ Cq−G′′ = 0. (2.23)

This equation of coefficients is very important, in that it specifies the Ck which are used to make up the wavefunction ψ in Equation 2.16.

2.5 Bloch’s theorem

Equation 2.23 only involves coefficients Ck in which k = q − G, with the G being general reciprocal lattice vectors. In other words, if we choose a particular value of q, then the only Ck that feature in Equation 2.23 are of the form Cq−G; these coefficients specify the form that the the wavefunction ψ will take (see Equation 2.16). Therefore, for each distinct value of q, there is a wavefunction ψq(r) that takes the form

ψq(r) =

G

Cq−Gei(q−G).r, (2.24)

where we have obtained the equation by substituting k = q − G into Equation 2.16. Equation 2.24 can be rewritten

ψq(r) = eiq.r^

G

Cq−Ge−iG.r^ = eiq.ruj,q, (2.25)

i.e. (a plane wave with wavevector within the first Brillouin zone)×(a function uj,q with the periodicity of the lattice).^7

This leads us to Bloch’s theorem. “The eigenstates ψ of a one-electron Hamiltonian H = − ¯h

(^2) ∇ 2 2 m + V (r), where V (r + T) = V (r) for all Bravais lattice translation vectors T can be chosen to be a plane wave times a function with the periodicity of the Bravais lattice.” Note that Bloch’s theorem

  • is true for any particle propagating in a lattice (even though Bloch’s theorem is traditionally stated in terms of electron states (as above), in the derivation we made no assumptions about what the particle was);
  • makes no assumptions about the strength of the potential.

(^7) You can check that uj,q (i.e. the sum in Equation 2.25) has the periodicity of the lattice by making the substitution r → r + T (see Equations 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 if stuck).

2.6. ELECTRONIC BANDSTRUCTURE. 19

2.6 Electronic bandstructure.

Equation 2.25 hints at the idea of electronic bandstructure. Each set of uj,q will result in a set of electron states with a particular character (e.g. whose energies lie on a particular dispersion relationship^8 ); this is the basis of our idea of an electronic band. The number of possible wavefunctions in this band is just going to be given by the number of distinct q, i.e. the number of Born-von Karman wavevectors in the first Brillouin zone. Therefore the number of electron states in each band is just 2×(the number of primitive cells in the crystal), where the factor two has come from spin-degeneracy. This is going to be very important in our ideas about band filling, and the classification of materials into metals, semimetals, semiconductors and insulators. We are now going to consider two tractable limits of Bloch’s theorem, a very weak periodic potential and a very strong periodic potential (so strong that the electrons can hardly move from atom to atom). We shall see that both extreme limits give rise to bands, with band gaps between them. In both extreme cases, the bands are qualitatively very similar; i.e. real potentials, which must lie somewhere between the two extremes, must also give rise to qualitatively similar bands and band gaps.

2.7 Reading.

This topic is treated with some expansion in Chapter 2 of Band theory and electronic properties of solids, by John Singleton (Oxford University Press, 2001). A simple justification of the Bloch theorem is given in Introduction to Solid State Physics, by Charles Kittel, seventh edition (Wiley, New York

  1. in the first few pages of Chapter 7 and in Solid State Physics, by G. Burns (Academic Press, Boston, 1995) Section 10.4; an even more elementary one is found in Electricity and Magnetism, by B.I. Bleaney and B. Bleaney, revised third/fourth editions (Oxford University Press, Oxford) Section 12.3. More rigorous and general proofs are available in Solid State Physics, by N.W Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1976) pages 133-140.

(^8) A dispersion relationship is the function E = E(q).