Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Ninety-five Theses by Martin Luther October 31, 1517 ..., Lecture notes of Theology

Theses #90-95 are the Conclusion to Luther's argument that indulgences do not forgive; it is only the pope and the priests who have the authority to forgive ...

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

mariners
mariners 🇺🇸

4.5

(15)

247 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
The Ninety-five Theses by Martin Luther
October 31, 1517, Wittenberg, Germany
1
The Ninety-Five Theses
The Disputation on the Power and
Efficacy of Indulgences
Posted: October 31, 1517
The Eve of All Saints Day
Castle Church
Wittenberg, Germany
For oral debate on November 1, 1517
Out of love and zeal for truth and the desire to
bring it to light, the following theses will be
publicly discussed at Wittenberg under the
chairmanship of the reverend father, Martin
Luther, Master of Arts and Sacred Theology and
regularly appointed Lecturer on these subjects at
that place. He requests that those who cannot be
present to debate orally with us will do so by
letter.
In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.
The first three theses statements are for
discussion on the importance of God’s Word in
the Holy Bible for the Christian’s life.
1. When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said,
“Repent” [Matthew 4:17], he willed the entire
life of believers to be one of repentance.
2. This word cannot be understood as referring
to the sacrament of penance, that is
confession and satisfaction, as administered
by the clergy.
3. Yet it does not mean solely inner repentance;
such inner repentance is worthless unless it
produces various outward mortifications of
the flesh.
Theses #4-14 address the power of the
pope, challenge the teachings of purgatory,
address the corruption of the clergy, and
the source of the forgiveness of sins as a
direct act from God.
4. The penalty of sin remains as long as the
hatred of self, that is, true inner repentance,
until our entrance into the kingdom of heaven.
5. The pope neither desires nor is able to remit
any penalties except those imposed by his
own authority or that of the canons.
6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by
declaring and showing that it has been
remitted by God; or, to be sure, by remitting
guilt in cases reserved to his judgment. If his
right to grant remission in these cases were
disregarded, the guilt would certainly remain
unforgiven.
7. God remits guilt to no one unless at the same
time he humbles him in all things and makes
him submissive to his vicar, the priest.
8. The penitential canons are imposed only on
the living, and, according to the canons
themselves, nothing should be imposed on the
dying.
9. Therefore the Holy Spirit through the pope is
kind to us insofar as the pope in his decrees
always makes exception of the article of death
and necessity.
10. Those priests act ignorantly and wickedly
who, in the case of the dying reserve canonical
penalties for purgatory.
11. Those tares of changing the canonical penalty
to the penalty of purgatory were evidently
sown while the bishops slept. [Matthew
13:25]
12. In former times canonical penalties were
imposed, not after, but before absolutism, as
tests of true contrition.
13. The dying are freed by death from all
penalties, are already dead as far as the canon
laws are concerned, and have a right to be
released from them.
14. Imperfect piety or love on the part of a dying
person necessarily brings with it great fear,
and the smaller the love, the greater the fear.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download The Ninety-five Theses by Martin Luther October 31, 1517 ... and more Lecture notes Theology in PDF only on Docsity!

October 31, 1517, Wittenberg, Germany

The Ninety-Five Theses

The Disputation on the Power and

Efficacy of Indulgences

Posted: October 31, 1517

The Eve of All Saints Day

Castle Church

Wittenberg, Germany

For oral debate on November 1, 1517

Out of love and zeal for truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following theses will be publicly discussed at Wittenberg under the chairmanship of the reverend father, Martin Luther, Master of Arts and Sacred Theology and regularly appointed Lecturer on these subjects at that place. He requests that those who cannot be present to debate orally with us will do so by letter.

In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

The first three theses statements are for discussion on the importance of God’s Word in the Holy Bible for the Christian’s life.

  1. When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, “Repent” [Matthew 4:17], he willed the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.
  2. This word cannot be understood as referring to the sacrament of penance, that is confession and satisfaction, as administered by the clergy.
  3. Yet it does not mean solely inner repentance; such inner repentance is worthless unless it produces various outward mortifications of the flesh.

Theses #4-14 address the power of the pope, challenge the teachings of purgatory, address the corruption of the clergy, and the source of the forgiveness of sins as a direct act from God.

  1. The penalty of sin remains as long as the hatred of self, that is, true inner repentance, until our entrance into the kingdom of heaven.
  2. The pope neither desires nor is able to remit any penalties except those imposed by his own authority or that of the canons.
  3. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring and showing that it has been remitted by God; or, to be sure, by remitting guilt in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant remission in these cases were disregarded, the guilt would certainly remain unforgiven.
  4. God remits guilt to no one unless at the same time he humbles him in all things and makes him submissive to his vicar, the priest.
  5. The penitential canons are imposed only on the living, and, according to the canons themselves, nothing should be imposed on the dying.
  6. Therefore the Holy Spirit through the pope is kind to us insofar as the pope in his decrees always makes exception of the article of death and necessity.
  7. Those priests act ignorantly and wickedly who, in the case of the dying reserve canonical penalties for purgatory.
  8. Those tares of changing the canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory were evidently sown while the bishops slept. [Matthew 13:25]
  9. In former times canonical penalties were imposed, not after, but before absolutism, as tests of true contrition.
  10. The dying are freed by death from all penalties, are already dead as far as the canon laws are concerned, and have a right to be released from them.
  11. Imperfect piety or love on the part of a dying person necessarily brings with it great fear, and the smaller the love, the greater the fear.

October 31, 1517, Wittenberg, Germany

Theses #15 – 82 are the core arguments by Martin Luther against indulgences and the tactics of the preachers who are selling letters of indulgence in Germany.

  1. This fear of horror is sufficient in itself, to say nothing of other things, to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near the horror of despair.
  2. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ the same as despair, fear, and assurance of salvation.
  3. It seems as though for the souls in purgatory fear should necessarily decrease and love increase.
  4. Furthermore, it does not seem proved, either by reason or Scripture, that souls in purgatory are outside the state of merit, that is, unable to grow in love.
  5. Nor does it seem proved that souls in purgatory, at least not all of them, are certain and assured of their own salvation, even if we ourselves may be entirely certain of it.
  6. Therefore the pope, when he uses the words, “plenary remission of all penalties,” does not actually mean “all penalties,” but only those imposed by himself.
  7. Thus those indulgence preachers are in error who say that a man is absolved from every penalty and saved by papal indulgences.
  8. As a matter of fact, the pope remits to souls in purgatory no penalty, which, according to canon law, they should have paid in their life.
  9. If remission of all penalties whatsoever could be granted to anyone at all, certainly it would be granted only to the most perfect, that is, to very few.
  10. For this reason most people are necessarily deceived by that indiscriminate and high- sounding promise of release from penalty.
  11. That power which the pope has in general over purgatory corresponds to the power which any bishop or curate has in a particular way in his own diocese or parish.
    1. The pope does very well when he grants remission to souls in purgatory, not but the power of the keys, which he does not have (i.e. does not extend to purgatory), but by way of intercession for them.
    2. They preach only human doctrines who say that as soon as the money clinks into the money chest, the soul flies out of purgatory.
    3. It is certain that when money clinks in the money chest, greed and avarice can be increased; but when the church intercedes, the result is in the hands of God alone.
    4. Who knows whether all souls in purgatory wish to be redeemed, since we have exceptions in St. Severinius and St. Paschal, as related in a legend? (i.e. Both of these popes desired to stay in purgatory longer than necessary to receive greater glory in heaven)
    5. No one is sure of the integrity of his own contrition, much less of having received plenary remission.
    6. The man who actually buys indulgences is as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.
    7. Those who believe that they can be certain of their salvation because they have indulgence letters will be eternally damned together with their teachers.
    8. Men must be especially on their guard against those who say that the pope’s pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to him.
    9. For the graces of indulgences are concerned only with the penalties of sacramental satisfaction established by man.
  12. They who teach that contrition is not necessary on the part of those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional privileges preach unchristian doctrine.
    1. Any truly repentant Christian has the right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without indulgence letters.

October 31, 1517, Wittenberg, Germany

preachers do not distribute them freely but only gather them.

  1. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the saints, for, even without the pope, the latter always work grace for the inner man and the cross, death, and hell for the outer man.
  2. St. Laurence said that the poor of the church were the treasures of the church, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his own time.
  3. Without want of consideration we say that the keys of the church, given by the merits of Christ, are that treasure.
  4. For it is clear that the pope’s power is of itself sufficient for the remission of penalties and cases reserve by himself.
  5. The true treasure of the church is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God.
  6. But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it males the first to be last. [Matthew 20:16]
  7. On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most acceptable for it makes the last to be first.
  8. Therefore the treasures of the gospel are nets with which one formerly fished for men of wealth.
  9. The treasures of indulgences are nets with which one now fishes for the wealth of men.
  10. The indulgences, which the demagogues acclaim as the greatest graces, are actually understood to be such only insofar as they promote gain.
  11. They are nevertheless in truth the most insignificant graces when compared with the grace of God and the piety of the cross.
  12. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of papal indulgences with all reverence.
  13. But they are much more bound to strain their eyes and ears lest these men preach their own dreams instead of what the pope has commissioned.
    1. Let him who speaks against the truth concerning papal indulgences be anathema and accursed;
    2. But let him who guards against the lust and license of the indulgence preachers be blessed;
    3. Just as the pope justly thunders against those who by any means whatsoever contrive harm to the sale of indulgences,
    4. But much more does he intend to thunder against those who use indulgences as a pretest to contrive him to holy love and truth.
    5. To consider papal indulgences so great that they could absolve a man even if he had done the impossible and had violated the mother of God is madness.
    6. We say on the contrary that papal indulgences cannot remove the very least of venial sins so far as guilt is concerned.
    7. To say that even St. Peter, if he were now pope, could not grant greater graces is blasphemy against St. Peter and the pope.
    8. We say on the contrary that even the present pope, or any pope whatsoever, has greater graces at his disposal, that is, the gospel, spiritual powers, gifts of healing, etc. as it is written in 1 Corinthians 12:28.
    9. To say that the cross emblazoned with the papal coat of arms, and set up by the indulgence preachers, is equal in worth to the cross of Christ is blasphemy.
    10. The bishops, curates, and theologians who permit such talk to be spread among the people will have to answer for this.
    11. This unbridled preaching of indulgences makes it difficult even for learned men to rescue the reverence, which is due the pope from slander or from the shrewd questions of the laity.

October 31, 1517, Wittenberg, Germany

Theses # 83-89 use the same style of the repetitive use of “Again,” which is then followed by a quoted statement.

  1. Again, “Why are funeral and anniversary masses for the dead continued and why does he not return or permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded for them, since it is wrong to pray for the redeemed?”

84, Again, “What is this new piety of God and the pope that for a consideration of money they permit a man who is impious and their enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of God and do not rather, because of the need of that pious and beloved soul, free it for pure love’s sake?”

  1. Again, “Why are the penitential canons, long since abrogated and dead in actual fact and through disuse, now satisfied by the granting of indulgences as though they were still alive and in force?”
  2. Again, “Why does not the pope, whose wealth is today greater than the wealth of the richest Crassus, build this one basilica of St. Peter with his own money rather than with the money of the poor believers?”
  3. Again, “What does the pope remit or grant to those who by perfect contrition already have a right to full remission and blessings?”
  4. Again, “What greater blessing could come to the church than if the pope were to bestow these remissions and blessings on every believer a hundred times a day, as he now does but once?”
  5. “Since the pope seeks the salvation of the souls rather than money by indulgences, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons previously granted when they have equal efficacy?”

Theses #90-95 are the Conclusion to Luther’s argument that indulgences do not forgive; it is only the pope and the priests who have the authority to forgive sins.

  1. To repress these very sharp arguments of the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the church

and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies and to make Christians unhappy.

  1. If, therefore, indulgences were preached according to the spirit and intention of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved. Indeed they would not exist.
  2. Away then with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, “Peace, peace,” and there is no peace! [Jeremiah 6:14]
  3. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, “Cross, cross,” and there is no cross!
  4. Christians should be exhorted to be diligent in following Christ, their head, through penalties, death, and hell;
  5. And thus be confident of entering into heaven through many tribulations rather than through the false security of peace. [Acts 14:22]