Download THE EQUATION Earth Gravity & The Great Pyramid Of Giza and more Study notes Logic in PDF only on Docsity!
THE EQUATION
Earth Gravity & The Great Pyramid Of Giza
By Jean Seimple I, August 26, 2021.
Abstract
We will demonstrate that the gravitational characteristics of the Earth conducive to the emergence of life as we know it, appear indisputably in the dimensions of the Great Pyramid of Giza and that these same dimensions are linked to a very simple, unique, and magnificent equation. That the anomaly observed of 6° of the orbit of the Earth with the the plane of the equator of the sun is engraved deeply inside the architecture of the Great Pyramid and that it is as well the reason for the divergence between the flattening factors of the Earth. Factors defined by : 1- Its theoretical value 2- Its measured dimensions 3- Satellite measurements. Finally, we will show that this equation allowed us to determine the fundamental forms of G and c, as well as new fundamental formulas.
CONTENTS
- Foreword. Introduction
- The meter, universal standard.
- The official dimensions of the Great Pyramid.
- The equation of the Great Pyramid.
- The flattening of the Earth.
- The anomaly of the current geometric flattening rate.
- Einstein on Hapgood's theory.
- Albert Einstein's calculation.
- Reasons for climate change.
- The anomaly of the orbit of the earth transmitted by the Great Pyramid.
- Action – reaction.
- The earth shifting crust transmitted by the Great Pyramid.
- Summary.
- Conclusion.
- Acknowledgment.
- I. The boat and the sky map. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONS
- II. The second date : 4600 BC.
- III. The chronology of events.
- IV. Calculations and references of the three photos.
- V. The perihelion and the height of the Great Pyramid.
- VI. The fundamental form of G.
- VII. Theoretical writing of c.
- VIII. Geometric particularities of the equation.
The common error to all researchers, myself still included now a day, is the following : If we had a correct or incorrect hypothesis about the meaning of a dimension, but it did not correspond exactly to the dimension noted, then we deduce that it was due to an imprecision of this very measurement. Our work shows that the dimensions recorded in the field by surveyors then set as official references by official Egyptology are very precise and therefore correspond accurately to the architect's original plan. Just like you saw it with the rhomboidal pyramid of Dashour : architecture wrongly considered as a construction error^11 If you have a good assumption and that you notice a slight imprecision on the measurement. So in this specific case of the Great Pyramid, it is because this measurement is the vector of the second piece of information. The architecture of the Great Pyramid is almost perfect, if not perfect. What you will get to see in this article. Take for example the precision of the orientation of the Great Pyramid to 0.05° with the North and the geographic south. This supposed error of precision, considered as an architectural feat for this type of building, is, in reality, a tiny “imprecision” desired by the architect^22.
2. The meter, universal standard.
In the recent past, there were as many measurement standards as there were people. This profusion of standards is and always has been a source of confusion, of extremely troublesome error, for science, agriculture, trade, etc. It is a brake in the race for progress. Also, having a common and universal standard is a logical and natural consequence, moreover mandatory in the evolution of a civilization. To establish a common standard we need a physical object, measurable, immutable, common to all humanity. The only physical object meeting these conditions is right at hand, or should I say ; under our feet… This is our dear planet : The Earth. There is no other choice. On July 11, 1792, the meter was officially adopted as universal measurement standard and this according to the dimensions of our planet as follows / « We choose the unit of measurement to be the ten-millionth part of a quarter of the Earth's meridian and we decided to call it “meter” ».^33 1 See our paper : The Bent Pyramid Has Delivered His Secret 2 See our computer simulation on the concavity of the faces of the Great Pyramid. (Part I) 3 Borda, Lagrange, Condorcet and Laplace, Report made to the Académie des Sciences on the nomenclature of measurements linear and superficial[archive], July 11, 1792, Annales de chimie, Paris, 1793, Volume 16, p. 253.
Figure 1. In this photo of the definition of the meter, we can observe that from a quarter of a circle we have drawn a straight line and therefore converted a circle with a circumference of 4 m into a square with perimeter 4 and side 1. « The circle is equal to the square… » “The meter” : the natural universal standard is now adopted. It is a progress that enters in the logical evolution of a civilization, like mastering the fire, the wheel, or the electricity. Today it is the first unit of length in the International System (SI). The measurement standards of ancient Egyptian civilization have questioned researchers a lot, since certain elements indicate that they used the “cubit” derived from the meter… For example, the main standard used by the Egyptians is the royal cubit, whose length given by
Flinders Petrie, is between 0.5235 m and 0.5239 m^44 , that is to say, a value very close to π/ 6, in
meters… Another element : in the Great Pyramid, built with the royal cubit, the emblematic chamber known
as the King's chamber, whose perimeter is given at 60 royal cubits, which is about 31.4 m (10 × π).
Unfortunately, these very intriguing elements have never allowed Egyptologists to say with certainty that there was a link between the Egyptian cubit and the meter. As explained before, the meter is simply the Earth, a natural standard, so the right question to ask is : did we invent the meter or did we just rediscover it? «One does not invent the wheel, one discovers it, or rediscovers it...» This article will provide an answer to this question and show that it is indeed the meter that the architect used to build the Great Pyramid, the royal cubit being only a sub-unit, carrying a symbolic and sacred message. Meter, perfectly identical to ours and which illuminates the Great Pyramid in such a dazzling way, that no one (officially) had noticed it. 4 The Cubit : A History and Measurement Commentary. Journal of Anthropology /volume 2014| Article ID 489757 |
4. The equation of the Great Pyramid.
“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication”. Leonardo De Vinci. If you want to take any value as a radius and create a perfect circle, there is only one way to do so : you have to multiply this value by the transcendent number π. You will then obtain, by doubling the result (a symmetry), the circumference of a perfect circle. It is an immutable mathematical rule. Except in mathematics, there is often what is called : « the exception which confirms the rule »… Indeed, there is an exception which confirms this rule, since there is a second way to obtain the circumference of a perfect circle without having to multiply by π… Can you find it? If we were to ask a little child this question, there is a high probability that he would find the answer before his parents… The second way to make a perfect circle is not to multiply by π, but to simply add π to it! There is only one value that can become a perfect circle by simply adding π to it and it is the mathematical and geometric solution of a magnificent equation :
π × R = π + R
Solution of the equation :
R = π / (π – 1) of numerical value : 1.4669…
P = 2π^2 / (π − 1) of numerical value : 9.2170…
Let us name the radius and the perimeter solution of this equation : Req u. and Pequ. Now compare these two values, with the dimensions of the Great Pyramid. Radius of the equation Requ : 1. Average height of the Great Pyramid : 1.46632 hm Perimeter of the equation Pequ : 9. Average perimeter of the Great Pyramid : 9.21422 hm Perimeter correspondence : 99.969 % Height correspondence : 99.957 % Definition n° 1.
The Great Pyramid is the unique geometric solution of our magnificent equation in meters.
THE Great Pyramid EQUATION : π × R = π + R
« The circle is equal to the square…", « the multiplication is equal to the addition… » Our work could have ended here, showing you the extraordinary and magnificent mathematical equation which governs the Great Pyramid. This magnificent equation engraved in this structure is not the result of chance, it is a deliberate choice of the architect of the Great Pyramid to build this particular pyramid, unique in its kind, very slightly removed from the solution of the equation! All this in order to be able to transmit not one message, but several messages. Also the Great Pyramid is an architectural perfection. This is what we are going to try to demonstrate to you and you will see that it is all just incredible. But before that, I have to show you one of the remarkable geometric properties of this equation^99. Figure 2. The ratio of the areas of the circle and the square of the equation, give the inverse ratio of the square and the primordial circle. The ratio of the areas of the circleequ’and of the squareequ, gives the ratio 4 / π, i.e. the diameter of a circle 4, which corresponds to the diameter of the Earth on a scale of 1 / 10,000,000th^ and thus shows that the official definition of the meter is deeply rooted in the Great Pyramid… 4 / π = 1.2732 m Earth diameter = 1.2742 m We can see by this imprecision, that the Earth is not a perfect sphere as we know well today, which brings us to the ellipsoidal shape of the Earth. 9 Other remarkable geometric properties will be presented in the Annex part (end of article).
Figure 3. The J2 effect, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Credit, United Space Alliance. Satellites that revolve around the Earth are influenced by the ellipsoidal shape of the earth. By measuring these gravimetric variations, we can therefore, by going backward in the logic, determine the exact shape of the Earth by measuring the variations in their orbits dynamically. Today its value is given at : 0.00 108 263^1111 Here are now the dimensions of the Earth, according to the definition of the meter. Southern circumference of the Earth : 40,007,864 m ÷ 40,000,000 = 1.0 001 966 m 1.0 001 966 m ÷ J 2 = 923.85 m Perimeter of the Great Pyramid = 921.42 m Pequ= 9. 11 Earth Fact Sheet, NASA
We fall back on the dimensions of the Great Pyramid in meters as well as on the solution of the equation… Newton's calculation is corroborated by satellite gravity measurements! There is thus a mathematical relation between the geometrical rate of Newton and J 2. f New / 4 = 0.00 108 695 J 2 = 0.00 108 263 J 2 corresponds approximately to ¼ f New We find the mathematical relation, between the circle and the square, by the official definition of the meter and the equation. This ratio of ¼ had been predicted by Newton^1212 , where he notes the anomaly between calculation and measurement: “ … Newton does not make a general demonstration of the problem posed, but he has an intuition of the result, which is correct for a homogeneous body. He shows that the variation in gravity between the pole and the equator is equal to a quarter of the variation resulting from the rotation : the variation in gravity that he calculates is too small compared to the observations! He justifies : '' These differences [in the observation of the length of the pendulum in different regions of the world] must be attributed, partly to the errors made in the observations, partly to the dissimilarity of the internal parts of the earth, & to the different height of the mountains, & part at the different air temperature ''” We notice by observation, the measurement of J 2 therefore corresponds approximately to the inverse of Pequation.
J 2 ≃
Pequ.
I also note in passing a simplified relation in pure value, between the gravitational acceleration field at the equator, Requ and a simplfied G (which we will see again in Appendix). ge ≃9.78 033 (m / s^2 )^1313 Requ ≃ 1.4669 and G ≃6. G × Requ’≃9. ge ≃ G × 10^11 × Requ (2) 12 Newton, 1756. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, translation by the Marquise du Chastelet augmented by Clairaut's Commentaries. Reissue, Paris, A. Blanchard, 1966 13 Taylor, Barry N.; Thompson, Ambler, eds. (March 2008). The international system of units (SI)(PDF) (Report). National Institute of Standards and Technology. p. 52. NIST special publication 330, 2008 edition.
It is the highest continent in the world, with an average altitude of 2300 m, an eastern plateau of about ten million square kilometers, covered with a significant layer of ice that can reach more than 4000 meters in thickness. Thus the geographic South Pole has an average altitude of 2.83 km 1515 , unlike the North pole , where the ice sheet is barely 3 m thick. Figure 5. Comparison of the north and South Poles. If we moved Antarctica, then the measured geometric flattening rate of the earth would be more in line with Newton's flattening factor, coefficient J 2 and the equation. Figure 6. Comparison of the present value of the geometric flattening factor, 1/298 with Newton's rate. In 1955, Albert Einstein, “electrified” in his own words by the work of American scholar Charles Hapgood, ardently argued that the upheavals on Earth about 11,000 years ago at the time of the Younger Dryas, caused a displacement of the Antarctic continent. Move from a home position closer to the Equator to its current position at the South Pole. This theory, which I happen to know for quite some time now, never convinced me, it was so disturbing. After years of research and the good fortune to have been able to decode another 15 The sign mentions the dates of arrival at the pole of Roald Amundsen and Robert Scott, as well as the 'altitude de 2835 m
message from the Great Pyramid, I can say with a pretty high level of confidence that once again ; Einstein was right. Developing our demonstration here is unfortunately impossible, because we would deviate from the main topic of this article, especially knowing that the mass of information which confirms this theory is quite substantial : more than 400 pages in our book. However, we are going to share with you some information, some of which is directly related to the gravitational characteristics of the Earth, which is sufficient to convince you.
7. Einstein on Hapgood's theory.
In an interview with journalists from "S aturday Evening Post," Albert Einstein said that this theory can easily be confirmed or refuted by a quick calculation. Indeed, if we know the rate of yearly precipitation in Antarctica, the height of the ice cover will tell us about its age. Albert Einstein on the work of Charles hapgood, « Saturday Evening Post », January 10, 1959 p 67. At the start of his work on the theory of movement of the earth crust shifting, Professor Hapgood presented his findings to Albert Einstein. Excerpts from Professor Einstein's response letter : “I find your arguments very impressive and I feel your assumption is correct. There can be little doubt that significant shifts in the earth's crust have occurred repeatedly and within a short period of time. The empirical material that you have compiled would hardly allow another interpretation. It is certainly also true that ice is continually being deposited in the polar regions. These deposits must lead to the instability of the crust when it is strong enough not to keep itself constantly in equilibrium by the adjustment of the polar regions. The thickness of the ice sheet at the level of the polar regions must, if this is the case, constantly
Figure 7. Temperature curves reconstructed from ice cores taken from the Vostok boreholes (blue line) and d 'Epica (black line) in Antarctica and the GRIP borehole (red line) in Greenland, which show the importance of the Younger Dryas event in the northern hemisphere.photo Wikipedia. Here is another temperature curve, more precisely dedicated only to drilling in Greenland. Figure 8. Temperature change in the post-glacial period according to ice cores from Greenland, United States Geological Survey_._ On these more detailed temperature curves, we note the dates of the anomalies more precisely and note the great consistency with the date obtained by the calculation of A. Einstein : 14,500 years ago, Antarctica was probably not at the South Pole.
9. Reasons for climate change.
To explain this drop in temperatures which began in 12,500 BC, several theories have been put forward :
- A modification of solar activity
- A disturbance of ocean currents
- An increase in volcanic activity
- The fall of an asteroid Our work shows that it was the passage through our solar system of a relatively small but very massive « dwarf planet-comet », that disturbed the gravitational characteristics of our planet. Two scientific studies as well as one big astronomical news support our theory.
- Elizabeth Bailey, Konstantin Batygin and Michael E. Brown, explain in their studies, what we proposed in 2015 in our book ; Solar Obliquity Induced by Planet Nine. Cornell University^1818 : The sun's six-degree obliquity suggests that either an asymmetry was present in the solar system's formation environment, or an external torque misaligned the angular momentum vectors of the sun and planets. However, the exact origin of this obliquity remains an open question. Batygin & Brown (2016) recently showed that the physical alignment of the distant orbits of the Kuiper belt can be explained by a planet of earth mass 5 to 20 times bigger in a distant, eccentric and inclined orbit, with an approximate perihelion distance of about 250 AU. Using an analytical model for the secular interactions between Planet Nine and the remaining giant planets, we show here that a planet with similar parameters can naturally generate the observed skew as well as the specific polar position of the sun's axis of rotation., from an initial almost aligned state. Thus, Planet Nine offers a verifiable explanation for the Solar System's otherwise mysterious spin-orbit misalignment. What diverges with our work is that it is not planet Nine, but a « dwarf planet-comet » (the hypothesis of two distinct stars should not be ruled out).
- A study published in the Scientific Report^1919 shows that the sediment at the bottom of Lake White Pond, South Carolina, contains excessive levels of platinum. Christophe Moore, the author of this study, explains : “Platinum is certainly found naturally in the earth's crust, but in very small amounts, explains The fact that there is much more platinum than palladium suggests that this platinum comes from an external source, such as the atmospheric impacts of a comet ”,
- Last but not least, the passage in our solar system of C / 2014 UN271, the largest “comet” in the history of astronomy, fits perfectly with the information transmitted by the Great Pyramid, which we were able to decode. 18 Elizabeth Bailey, Konstantin Batygin, Michael E. Brown Solar Obliquity Induced by Planet Nine. Cornell University https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.03963v 19 Sediment Cores from White Pond, South Carolina, contain a Platinum Anomaly, Pyrogenic Carbon Peak, and Coprophilous Spore Decline at 12.8 ka https://www.nature.com/articles / s41598-019-51552-
equator of the sun, was also transmitted to us by the architect of the Great Pyramid through the famous so-called “ventilation” shafts.. Figure 10. Values of the angles in decimal degrees of the shafts of the Great Pyramid. These shafts point to a particular point in the sky, but which one? REFERENCES LOWER SOUTH LOWER NORTH
UPPER
SOUTH
UPPER
NORTH
GANTENBRINK 39.6° 39° 45° 32.46°
Table 2. Angle values of the four shafts of the great pyramid. We used the field surveys of Rudolf Gantenbrink^2121 , one of the few scientists with his team to have explored and measured the interior of these shafts with great precision. The scientific team exploring the shaft of the lower chamber, known as “the Queen's chamber” with the Djedi robot. Photo Sandro Vannin. 21 Gantenbrink measurement, The Khufu shafts/ Original website (archives) enter/findings/additional measurements/
The shafts are aligned with an accuracy of 0.05° with the true North and the South, geographic (5) If we extend the paths of the two shafts of the lower chamber, these form an angle of approximately 90° with the external facade of the Great Pyramid and intercept the ninetieth seat (fig. 11) Figure 11. The shafts of the Great Pyramid, Maragioglio, Vito and Celeste Ambrogio Rinaldi. l’Architettura delle Piramidi Menfite 4. Le Grande Piramide di Cheope. Tavole. Tipografia Canessa : Rapallo, 1965. The angle of 90°, corresponds to the latitude of the poles. By combining these three pieces of information, we obtain : Sky, North Pole and South Pole. These shafts want to mean us : the north and South Celestial Poles. If their overall diagram does not show any apparent logic, a simple condition will clarify and explain their disposition. We have to look through these shafts and observe, not from two different places at the same time, but at the same place at two different times. If we relate these shafts to the same observation post, then a clear symmetry emerges.
