Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Elasticity of Demand: Percentage Changes and Revenue Impact - Prof. David Lutzer, Study notes of Mathematics

The concept of elasticity of demand in economics, focusing on percentage changes in demand and revenue. It covers the relationship between percentage change in demand and percentage change in price, and how elasticity of demand impacts revenue. The document also includes an example calculation using a specific demand function.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/10/2009

koofers-user-38j-1
koofers-user-38j-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 108: Notes on Elasticity of Demand
Percentage increases, Percentage rate of increase
A few months ago, Coca-cola in the second floor vending room of this building cost 75 cents per can.
Starting in September the price was $1 per can. The wrong way to look at this situation is “Twenty-five
cents is not much money, so the increase was small. The right way to look at the situation is “Dividing
the increase by the former price shows a 33% price increase and that’s big. It’s the percentage increase,
not the actual increase, that should worry consumers.
Whenever you have a function y=f(x)relating two quantities, we know that f0(x)gives the rate of
change of ycompared to x. The
relative rate of change =f0(x)
f(x)and percentage rate of change =100 f0(x)
f(x).
Note that these quantities probably depend on the xvalue you started with and should really be called the
relative and percentage rates of change starting at x.
Elasticity of Demand
Demand for gizmos is sensitive to unit price. An increase in price causes a drop in demand. Suppose
we have a demand equation x=f(p)where pis unit price and xis the number of gizmos that can be sold
at price p. The percentage rate of change in demand is
100 f0(p)
f(p).
This predicts the percentage change in demand corresponding to a price increase of $1, and it is always
negative. Starting at a given price p, raising prices by $1 will result in a percentage increase in price of
100 1
p. Economists define elasticity of demand starting at price level p to be the ratio
E=
percentage change in demand
percentage change in price
=
100 f0(p)
f(p)
100 1
p
=
pf0(p)
f(p)
.
Why use the absolute value? Because otherwise every entry in a table of demand elasticities would be
negative. Note that because our f0(p)<0, this is exactly the same as the book’s definition E=pf0(p)
f(p).
Why Care About Elasticity of Demand?
Recall that our revenue (= income) for selling gizmos is given by
R=Revenue =unit price number sold =pf(p)
where pis unit price and f(p)is the demand function. Our real interest is in the question “Will our revenue
rise if we increase prices slightly, starting at price level p?” In other words, is Ran increasing function
near p? In still other words, is R0(p)>0?
We use the product rule to find R0(p)and throw in some algebraic trickery to show how elasticity of
demand, E, is the key. At one point we will use the fact that pf0(p)
f(p)=E. Here is the calculation:
R0=pf0(p) + 1f(p) = f(p)pf0(p)
f(p)+1=f(p)(E+1).
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Elasticity of Demand: Percentage Changes and Revenue Impact - Prof. David Lutzer and more Study notes Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 108: Notes on Elasticity of Demand

Percentage increases, Percentage rate of increase

A few months ago, Coca-cola in the second floor vending room of this building cost 75 cents per can.

Starting in September the price was $1 per can. The wrong way to look at this situation is “Twenty-five

cents is not much money, so the increase was small. ” The right way to look at the situation is “Dividing

the increase by the former price shows a 33% price increase and that’s big.” It’s the percentage increase,

not the actual increase, that should worry consumers.

Whenever you have a function y = f (x) relating two quantities, we know that f

′ (x) gives the rate of

change of y compared to x. The

relative rate of change =

f

′ (x)

f (x)

and percentage rate of change = 100 ∗

f

′ (x)

f (x)

Note that these quantities probably depend on the x value you started with and should really be called the

relative and percentage rates of change starting at x.

Elasticity of Demand

Demand for gizmos is sensitive to unit price. An increase in price causes a drop in demand. Suppose

we have a demand equation x = f (p) where p is unit price and x is the number of gizmos that can be sold

at price p. The percentage rate of change in demand is

f

′ (p)

f (p)

This predicts the percentage change in demand corresponding to a price increase of $1, and it is always

negative. Starting at a given price p, raising prices by $1 will result in a percentage increase in price of

100 ∗

1 p

. Economists define elasticity of demand starting at price level p to be the ratio

E =

percentage change in demand

percentage change in price

f ′(p) f (p)

1 p

p ∗ f

′ (p)

f (p)

Why use the absolute value? Because otherwise every entry in a table of demand elasticities would be

negative. Note that because our f

′ (p) < 0, this is exactly the same as the book’s definition E =

−p∗ f ′(p) f (p)

Why Care About Elasticity of Demand?

Recall that our revenue (= income) for selling gizmos is given by

R = Revenue = unit price ∗ number sold = p ∗ f (p)

where p is unit price and f (p) is the demand function. Our real interest is in the question “Will our revenue

rise if we increase prices slightly, starting at price level p?” In other words, is R an increasing function

near p? In still other words, is R

′ (p) > 0?

We use the product rule to find R

′ (p) and throw in some algebraic trickery to show how elasticity of

demand, E, is the key. At one point we will use the fact that

p∗ f ′(p)

f (p)

= −E. Here is the calculation:

R

′ = p ∗ f

′ (p) + 1 ∗ f (p) = f (p) ∗

p ∗ f

′ (p)

f (p)

= f (p) ∗ (−E + 1 ).

Now f (p) > 0 always so that whether R

′ (p) > 0 boils down to whether 1 − E > 0 and that is the same as

whether 1 > E. We now have:

Theorem: R

′ (p) > 0 if and only if E < 1 where E =

p∗ f ′(p) f (p)

∣ so that

  • if E < 1 then a slight price rise will cause a revenue increase, and
  • if E > 1 then a slight price rise will cause a revenue decrease.

Economists say that demand is elastic at price level p if E > 1 at price p, and demand is inelastic at price

level p if E < 1. Therefore our theorem says “A slight price rise in an inelastic demand situation will cause

a revenue rise while a slight price rise in an inelastic demand situation will cause a revenue drop.” In other

words, if demand is inelastic, then price and revenue move in the same direction, and if demand is elastic,

then price and demand move in opposite directions.

Example

Suppose our demand function is f (p) =

10 , 000 p+ 50

− 30 and the current unit price is p = 150. Is demand

elastic or inelastic? What will be the effect on revenue of a slight price increase?

We see that f

′ (p) =

− 10 , 000 (p+ 50 )^2

so that

E =

p ∗

− 10 , 000

(p+ 50 )^2

10 , 000 p+ 50

Substituting p = 150 and doing lots of arithmetic gives E =

15 8

1 so that demand is elastic at price level

p = 150 and raising prices slightly from p = 150 will cause revenue to drop.

More interesting is the conclusion that lowering prices slightly from the p = 150 level will cause

revenue to rise.

On the other hand, starting at price level p = 10, E =

25 123

< 1 so that demand is inelastic, so that a

slight price rise from p = 10 will cause a revenue increase. Here is the Maple calculation.

f := -30 + 10000/(p+50);

E = - p*diff(f,p)/f;

subs(p = 150,E);

subs(p = 10, E);

HW = page 302 #13,15,19,