Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Lecture Notes on Urban Sprawl, Urban Sprawl Creates | ECON 462, Study notes of Economics

Material Type: Notes; Class: Economics of Energy, Resources and Environment; Subject: Economics; University: Central Washington University; Term: Fall 2005;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/19/2009

koofers-user-06y
koofers-user-06y 🇺🇸

5

(1)

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Nikishna Myron
11/30/05
ECON 462
Notes 10.2
Urban Sprawl
Criticisms of
Evidence of
Forces Leading to
Market Failures & Solutions
Urban Growth Boundaries
Other Contributors to
Byproducts of an attack on
Urban Sprawl creates:
1. More Traffic Congestions
2. More Air Pollution
3. Decay of Urban Centers
a. Because of the Urban Fringe
4. Isolating People
a. Reduces the social interations
Evidence of Urban Sprawl
Chicago had a 47% increase in size
a. With a 4% increase in population
Cleveland had a 33% increase in size
a. With a 4% decrease in population
Growth Management Plans
14 States with GMP’s
Oregon bought up 50% of the remaining open space with tax money
Sequence of Events
Restrict the amount of land for urban development
oPrice of housing goes up
Reduce the consumption of housing
New homes are smaller than they would have been
In Effect
1. Gains in social interactions
2. Lower Traffic Congestion
3. More environmental amenities
Any Form of Expansion
1. Population Growth
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Lecture Notes on Urban Sprawl, Urban Sprawl Creates | ECON 462 and more Study notes Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Nikishna Myron 11/30/ ECON 462 Notes 10. Urban Sprawl  Criticisms of  Evidence of  Forces Leading to  Market Failures & Solutions  Urban Growth Boundaries  Other Contributors to  Byproducts of an attack on Urban Sprawl creates:

  1. More Traffic Congestions
  2. More Air Pollution
  3. Decay of Urban Centers a. Because of the Urban Fringe
  4. Isolating People a. Reduces the social interations Evidence of Urban Sprawl  Chicago had a 47% increase in size a. With a 4% increase in population  Cleveland had a 33% increase in size a. With a 4% decrease in population Growth Management Plans  14 States with GMP’s  Oregon bought up 50% of the remaining open space with tax money Sequence of Events  Restrict the amount of land for urban development o Price of housing goes up  Reduce the consumption of housing  New homes are smaller than they would have been In Effect
  5. Gains in social interactions
  6. Lower Traffic Congestion
  7. More environmental amenities Any Form of Expansion
  8. Population Growth

ra r ( x,t,y,u,n ) X

  1. Rise in Household Incomes
  2. Decline in the cost of Commuting Sprawl comes from 3 different Market Failures
  3. failure to account for benefits of open spaces
  4. failure to account for social costs of freeway congestion
  5. failure to account for infrastructure costs of new development Can convert a Monocentric model to a Polycentric model without any loss of results Total Cost of Commuting  Per mile commuting cost at time^ t  If you live^ x^ miles from work o Then total cost is tx  Disposable income ( y - tx ) o Land (housing) q o Non-housing composite good, c o Land Rent, r , gets smaller further from work  All depend upon the city utility or happiness  The city has to be able to support the population,^ n  Open Space is assumed to be used for agricultural uses,^ ra o Ra ag land rent o R developed land rent As the population goes up 1%: The Elasticity goes up by 1.1% increase in land area Income Elasticity increases by 1.5% Agricultural Elasticity decreases by -.23% Assumes a central business area Just in Time inventory to keep storage sizes small

o Easy to misuse by making boundaries too small  Inappropriate increase in housing prices  Regressive prices  Help Landowners at the expense of Renters Other Contributors to Sprawl  High and Middle Income People for separate jurisdictions for their benefits o Set higher standards of public goods and services o While prohibiting low-income services  Called “Tiebout Sorting”  Diminished by Metropolitan Taxing o Wealthy people have lobbying power to prevent it  Double subsidy o For owner / occupier tax reductions  As well as the savings from taxed rent  Farm Subsidy Programs o Increase the agricultural land values  Property Tax reduces the development intensity o Bigger plots of land with smaller dwellings  Lack of incentive for development of urban core o Happens with increases of income  Higher income  Higher populations  Build more houses on the fringes  Older houses decrease in value  Disillusions from urban sprawl o Average city density is a public good o Have Planned Communities  High density housing  Close to city centers