






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An in-depth analysis of various leadership styles in the nursing profession, including transformational, emotional intelligence, relational, and task-focused approaches. The authors discuss the importance of leadership in healthcare services and the role of nurses as key players in patient safety and quality of care. They explore the impact of different leadership styles on employee satisfaction, organizational commitment, productivity, and patient outcomes.
What you will learn
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 11
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Recent developments in the field of management-organization and organiza- tional behavior and new concepts have also led to the emergence of new leadership styles in leadership. Leadership in health services is important for following innova- tions and adapting to current situations. Nurses working together with other health personnel in hospitals providing health services constitute an important group in leadership. Nursing, which is a key force for patient safety and safe care, is a human- centered profession, and therefore leadership is a key skill for nurses at all levels. The leadership styles of nurse managers are believed to be an important determi- nant of job satisfaction and persistence of nurses. The need for nurses with leader- ship skills and the need for nurses to develop their leadership skills are increasing day by day. There are several leadership styles defined in nursing literature. These leadership styles are examined under the titles of relational leadership style, transformational leadership, resonant leadership, emotional intelligence leadership, and participatory leadership. The task-focused leadership style is explored under the headings of transactional and autocratic leadership, laissez-faire leadership, and instrumental leadership. Keywords: nursing, leadership, leadership styles, patient safety, quality of care
“ Leadership is not only about individuals, but also about teams ” [ 1 ]. Nowadays, leadership in health services is an important issue that aims to protect and improve human health. Rapid changes and developments in the health sector increase the importance of developing managership and leadership skills for health managers [ 2 ]. Regional and national health systems tend to redesign their functions and priorities by making structural changes in social and economic terms to cope with the increasing health problems [ 3 ]. The inclusion of complex technol- ogy and intense human relations in hospital services, which constitute a significant part of health care services, leads to the emergence of important managerial prob- lems [ 4 ]. The existence of effective, creative, visionary, motivated, knowledgeable, principled leaders for the development of the institution is important to eliminate various problems in health services. To be able to do this, it is necessary to deter- mine the qualifications that can contribute to the effective leadership of corporate managers [ 2 , 5 ]. Leadership in health services is of great importance in terms of following innovations and adapting to existing situations [ 6 ]. Leadership can be defined as a multidimensional process, which means that a person motivates others to direct their activities and develop their skills under certain circumstances [ 3 , 7 ]. The leader is the person who sets the goals of his group and who influences and
Nursing - New Perspectives directs the members of the group in line with these goals [ 8 ]. In addition, a good leader must be dynamic, passionate, have a motivational effect on other people, be solution oriented, and try to inspire others. Nurses, who work together with other health personnel in hospitals, constitute an important group in leadership. Nursing, which is a key force for patient safety and safe care, is a human-centered profession, and therefore leadership is a key skill for nurses at all levels. The leadership styles of nurse managers are believed to be an important determinant of job satisfaction and job commitment of nurses. Nurses who are mobilized and empowered to perform specific personal or group goals by a good leader nurse are willing to implement evidence-based practices and are highly motivated, well informed, and committed to organizational goals. Therefore, they perform patient care in a more effective and planned process. It has become imperative to examine the role of leadership styles of nurse managers on staff outcomes after miscarriage of health workforce, which is a global nursing problem, increasing health care costs and workload [ 9 , 10 ]. There is a limited number of articles in the literature about the leadership styles of nurses. In these studies, the importance of leadership styles and prac- tices on patient outcomes and patient safety, health service power and corporate culture were determined [ 3 ]. However, Cummings [ 10 ] stated that most styles can be grouped under relational leadership or task-focused leadership. Relational leadership styles focus on people and relationships. It includes transformational, emotional intelligence, resonance, and participatory leadership. These styles are positively associated with staff satisfaction, organizational commitment, improved staff health welfare, stress reduction, job satisfaction, productivity increase, effective study, and positive patient outcomes. However, task-focused leadership is focused on completion of works, deadlines, and directives. Task-focused leadership styles include operational, autocratic, and laissez-faire leadership [ 10 ].
2.1 Relational leadership Relational leadership styles focus on people and relationships and include transformational, emotional intelligence, resonance, and participatory leadership [ 11 ]. These leadership styles are associated with increased employee satisfaction, organizational commitment, improved staff health and well-being, stress reduc- tion, job satisfaction, increased productivity, effective work, and positive patient outcomes [ 10 ]. 2.1.1 Transformational leadership Transformational leadership is considered the gold standard of leadership [ 11 ]. Transformational leadership is at the center of nursing because it has an impact on patient outcomes, employee satisfaction, and safety culture. Transformational nurse leaders first perform nursing, communicate effectively with their audiences, and become effective role models [ 12 ]. Such leaders are motivated and empowering, encouraging and following their audience for organizational goals and individual goals [ 13 , 20 ]. In addition, it is explained how the transformational leaders have four characteristics that affect their audience. These characteristics are charisma, inspirational, intellectual thinking, and individual attention [ 42 ]. It is thought that the transformational leaders fascinate their audience with the charisma feature. This fascination is sometimes associated with the physical
Nursing - New Perspectives 2.2.1 Transactional and autocratic leadership “Do it now!” This concept, which is referred to as “transactional leadership” in English literature, is used as “interactionist,” “operational,” or “transactional” leadership in different sources. Transactional leadership is a leadership style that provides short- term goals and motivates viewers through the fulfillment of individual needs in exchange for high performance toward organizational goals [ 19 ]. Leaders in trans- actional leadership act as exchanges managers by exchanging followers who lead to improvement in production, and are interested in processes rather than shared values with forward-thinking ideas [ 18 , 20 ]. Transactional leadership style emerges in two basic forms as “management with exceptions” and “conditional rewarding” [ 21 , 22 ]. The form management with exceptions is divided into two as active and passive. The active leader monitors the performance of the team followers and intervenes to correct these errors when he/she detects errors. The passive leader expects the followers’ mistakes to draw their attention before giving negative feedback or any warning [ 23 ]. In conditional rewarding, transactional leaders clearly explain to their followers what their duties are, how they will be made, and how they will be rewarded if the desired tasks are fulfilled satisfactorily [ 21 , 24 ]. Transactional leaders are cultural carriers who maintain the existing order and act in line with traditions and past [ 25 ]. In crises where an explicit orientation is required, the transactional leadership approach is an effective style. Transactional leadership can be the best leadership style for the direction of critical events [ 18 , 26 ]. This leadership style can be effective in emergency situations such as cardiac arrest, by enabling nurses to focus on the task as a whole on the patient [ 27 ]. In the literature, transactional leadership and transformational leadership are explained together and comparisons are made. Besides, unlike the transformational leadership, leaders who adopt an interactive approach want to maintain the same things instead of changing the future, and they are less concerned with the creative and innovative aspects and focus on concepts such as efficiency and quality [ 28 ]. Bass emphasizes the use of interactive leadership as a conditionally rewarding perfor- mance, especially among followers and leaders [ 29 ]. While transformational leader- ship results in a performance beyond expected, interactive leadership focuses on the expected results [ 30 ]. According to the transactional leadership, leadership is seen as a simple mutual exchange between leaders and followers based on economic or political reasons, while transformational leadership states that leaders and followers influence each other in order to achieve higher levels of motivation and morale [ 31 ]. Another type of transactional leadership is autocratic leadership. Autocratic lead- ers are defined as directives, controlling, power-oriented, and closed-minded. The leader describes the “what, when, why, and how” of the task. He/she emphasizes obedience, loyalty, and strict adherence to the rules. Followers do what the autocratic leader says [ 32 ]. The autocratic leadership style can be considered ideal in emergen- cies because he or she takes all decisions himself/herself, regardless of the views of the leading staff [ 3 ]. Because information is seen as power, critical information can be hidden from the team. Mistakes are not tolerated and individuals are accused rather than erroneous operations. Rewards are given for compliance, but disobedi- ence is punished [ 18 , 32 ]. In addition, autocratic leaders can create fear among staff and often make decisions without consulting the team [ 32 ]. These leaders motivate their subordinates by using their “legal powers,” “rewarding powers,” and “coercive forces.” Autocratic leaders may not be welcome by their team, but this can be trans- formed into appreciation and devotion when the positive results of their leadership
Leadership S tyles in N ursing DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen. emerge. Although staff do not like autocratic leaders, they often work well on their orders [ 18 , 32 ]. This leadership approach can be useful at the moment when it is necessary to make quick decisions or to mobilize uneducated and less-motivated fol- lowers in the short term by pressure and fear [ 6 , 33 , 34 ]. The positive aspect of this style is that it works perfectly in emergencies or chaotic situations with little time for discussion. Schoel et al. found that very popular leaders were perceived as ineffective, while unpopular leaders could be perceived as effective [ 35 ]. According to the results of Uysal et al., the perception of the behavior of hospital managers as autocratic by followers decreases the productivity of the work [ 6 ], because autocratic leadership is perceived negatively by the followers; the reason is that the authoritarian attitude does not give the employee the right to speak, and that the awards and punishments are precise and clear. 2.2.2 Laissez-faire leadership The style of leadership recognizing full freedom is also referred to as “laissez- faire” in the literature and is expressed as “let them do it.” This kind of a leader advises the process by not participating in the process, encourages followers to generate ideas, offers suggestions when asked by followers, and declares opinions. [ 31 ]. Leadership that recognizes full freedom is a style in which the leader provides little or no orientation or control, and prefers a practical approach. Fully free leadership style includes a leader who does not decide, and acts without staffing or supervision [ 3 ]. The main task of the leader is to provide resources. Such leaders dissipate responsibilities and retreat and refrain from taking decisions [ 31 ]. The leader only gives his/her opinion when asked about his/her opinion on any subject, but this view is not binding on his/her followers [ 36 ]. Leadership that recognizes full freedom is an authoritative, task-focused leader- ship style, because it involves the regulation of tasks in times of crisis, so it shows reactive leadership. This style of leadership is often used by inexperienced leaders or those who are about to vacate their leadership positions, who prefer to give up their followers or others to change their positions, such as those who would like to give up their job [ 18 ]. The leader leaves the followers on their own. Followers do what they think is the best. Followers are trained to find the best solution to their problems. Whenever he/she sees it necessary, a person can form a group with whom he/she wants to solve problems, try new ideas, and make the decisions that he/she thinks are most appropriate for him/her [ 37 , 38 ]. There are positive and negative aspects of the leadership style that gives full freedom. The first positive aspect of this leadership style is the determination and implementation of the goals, plans, and policies of employees or members of the organization, and it mobilizes the creativity of each member or employee [ 39 ]. The second positive aspect is that employees are motivated to train themselves and find the most appropriate solution to the problems. When the individual deems it neces- sary, he/she creates a group with the people he/she wants, solves the problems, tries new ideas, and reaches the most appropriate decisions [ 40 ]. The negative aspects of leadership, which gives full freedom, are the emergence of turmoil within the organization and the fact that everyone leads to the targets he/she wants and even toward opposing targets. Another disadvantage is the significant decrease in organi- zational success, independent of personal achievements. Skogstad et al. state that the type of leadership recognizing full liberty reinforces the role conflict and role ambiguity experienced by the individual, and increases the conflicts with colleagues [ 40 ]. Hinkin et al. also state that leadership behaviors that recognize full liberty harm the punitive and rewarding roles of the leader
Leadership S tyles in N ursing DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.
Serpil Çelik Durmuş^1 * and Kamile Kırca^2 1 Nursing Management Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey 2 Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey *Address all correspondence to: serpilcelik2010@gmail.com in health leadership and policy-making, while maintaining their traditional care skills [ 50 ]. The leadership style of executive nurses plays an important role in the provision of job satisfaction and motivation of nurses, development of institutional commitment, and effective management of conflicts [ 51 – 53 ]. In addition, effective leadership styles can increase the quality of health care outcomes. In addition, lead- ership in health facilities is considered as an important factor in ensuring quality health services, patient satisfaction, and financial performance.
Nurses are responsible for guiding the community because of their responsibili- ties in health care. Patient care and education, effective communication, and clinical management are the most important tasks. These tasks are closely related to leader- ship behavior. Nurses who exhibit leadership behavior will be pioneers in bringing the profession to a professional level. The goal of future health care institutions should be to influence the quality of patient care through a good nursing leadership. Future research should focus on the development, applicability, and implementa- tion of robust leadership style models in different health environments. These studies should include multidisciplinary professional teams; strengthen the role of nurses and other health professionals; and address organizational parameters and individual wishes, preferences, and expectations for quality of life and health care.
We thank everyone who provided scientific guidance.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. © 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Nursing - New P erspectives
[1] Darzi, A. High Quality Care For All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications/high-quality-care-for-all- nhs-next-stage-review-final-report [2] Keklik B. Determination of leadership types adopted in health services: A special hospital case. Afyon Kocatepe university. FEAS Journal. 2012; 14 (1):73- [3] Sfantou DF, Laliotis A, Patelarou AE, Pistollo DS, Matalliotakis M, Patelarou E. Importance of leadership style towards quality of care measures in healthcare settings: A systematic review. Healthcare. 2017; 5 (73):2- [4] Eryeşil K, İraz RA. Field study on the relationship between leadership styles and organizational commitment. Journal of Selçuk University Vocational School of Social Sciences. 2017; 20 (2):129- [5] Karahan A. Investigation of the relationship between leadership and organizational commitment in hospitals. Journal of Social Sciences. 2008; 10 (1):145- [6] Uysal ŞA, Keklik B, Erdem R, Çelik R. Investigation of the relationships between hospital Managers’ leadership traits and work productivity levels of employees. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration. 2012; 15 (1):25- [7] Koçel T. Business Management: Management and Organization, Behavior in Organizations, Classical, Modern, Contemporary and Contemporaneus Approaches. 10th ed. Istanbul: Beta Edition Publishing; 2005 [8] Sabuncuoglu Z, Tüz M. Organizational Psychology. Alfa Actual Distribution: Bursa; 2008 [9] Asamani JA, Naab F, Ofei AMA. Leadership styles in nursing management: Implications for staff outcomes. Journal of Health Science. 2016; 6 (1):23-36. DOI: 10.17532/ jhsci.2016. [10] Cummings G. Editorial: Your leadership style – How are you working to achieve a preferred future? Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2012; 21 (23-24):3325- [11] Cope V, Murray M. Leadership styles in nursing. Nursing Standard. 2017; 31 (43):61-70. DOI: 10.7748/ ns.2017.e [12] Anonson J, Walker ME, Arries E, Maposa S, Telford P, Berry L. Qualities of exemplary nurse leaders: Perspectives of frontline nurses. Journal of Nursing Management. 2014; 22 (1):127- [13] Brewer C, Kovner C, Djukic M, Fatehi F, Greene W, Chacko TP, et al. Impact of transformational leadership on nurse work outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016; 72 (11):2879- [14] Intestines AS, Peace VK. The effects of transformational and Interactionist leadership relationships on nursing and health services. ACU Health Information Journal. 2018; 9 (2):97- [15] Brendel W, Bennett C. Learning to embody leadership through mindfulness and somatics practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2016; 18 (3):409- [16] Laschinger HK, Wong CA, Cummings GG, Grau AL. Resonant leadership and workplace empowerment: The value of positive organisational cultures in reducing workplace incivility. Nursing Economics. 2014; 32 (1):5-
Nursing - New Perspectives and private sector organizations. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences. 2005; 4 (14):1- [34] Tengilimoglu D, Yigit A. A field study on the effect of leadership behaviors on personnel job satisfaction in hospitals. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration. 2005; 8 (3):374- [35] Schoel C, Bluemke M, Mueller P, Stahlberg D. When autocratic leaders become an option--uncertainty and self-esteem predict implicit leadership preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011; 101 (3):521-540. DOI: 10.1037/a [36] Arun K. Leadership Styles and Sharing Knowledge Relationship. Erzurum: Ataturk University, Institute of Social Sciences; 2008 [37] Minister I, Büyükbese T. Leadership types and current-future situation comparison of power sources: A field research based on the perceptions of the administrators of educational institutions. Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research. 2010; 12 (19):73- [38] Telli E, Unsar SA, Oguzhan A. The effects of leadership behavioral styles on Employees’ organizational burnout and displacement tendencies: A case study. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges. 2012; 2 (2):135- [39] Çetin T. The Effect of Fully Free Leadership Understanding on Innovation Trends of Mid-Term Managers: An Application in Furniture Enterprises in the Aegean Region. Unpublished Master Thesis, Dumlupınar University Institute of Social Sciences, Kütahya, 2009 [40] Skogstad A, Einarsen S, Torsheim T, Aasland MS, Hetland H. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2007; 12 (1):80- [41] Hinkin TR, Schriesheim CA. An examination of nonleadership: From Laissezfaire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008; 93 (6):1234- [42] Chaudhry AQ , Javed H. Impact of transactional and laissez faire leadership style on motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2012; 3 (7):258- [43] Antonakis J, House R. On İnstrumental Leadership: Beyond Transactions and Transformations. Omaha: UNL Gallup Leadership Institute Summit; 2004 [44] Hooijberg R, Antonakis J. Instrumental Leadership: The Nuts and Bolts of Leadership. [Internet].
Leadership S tyles in N ursing DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen. [50] Cherian S, Karkada S. Review on leadership in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Research and Practice. 2017; 4 (1):57- [51] Kurt SD. The Effect of Leadership Behaviors of Clinical Responsible Nurses on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction. (Thesis). Halic University, Institute of Health Sciences. İstanbul. 2009 [52] Bucak B. The Perceptions of Leadership Approaches and Conflict Management Strategies of Nurses Who Work in Two Different Hospitals in Ankara. (Thesis). Gazi University Institute of Health Sciences. Ankara. 2010 [53] Gülkaya G. Transformative Leadership Behaviors of Nurses in Service and Motivation Status of Nurses Working Together. (Thesis). Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences. Ankara. 2012