Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

JOMC 486 Mass Media Law-Final Exam with Questions and Answers, Exams of Journalism

JOMC 486 Mass Media Law-Final Exam with Questions and Answers FTC policy on deceptive advertising: ANSWER✓✓ 1. There must be a representation, omission, or practice that is likely to mislead the consumer 2. The act or practice must be considered from the perspective of a reasonable person 3. The deception must be material McNeil v. Pfizer ANSWER✓✓ A company launched an advertising campaign for Listerine Mouthwash, in which it was implied that listerine is as effective at fighting plaque and gingivitis as floss. A competing floss company sued for false advertising in violation of the Lanham act, and unfair competition in violation of state law. Judge recognized floss company's claim of literal falsity and on its implied falsity claim. In the end, Listerine ads could still use their studies to support the claim that their product fights plaque and gingivitis, as long as it does not invoke a comparison to floss (name the case)

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 02/23/2025

school-inspector
school-inspector 🇺🇸

2

(1)

4.5K documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download JOMC 486 Mass Media Law-Final Exam with Questions and Answers and more Exams Journalism in PDF only on Docsity!

FTC policy on deceptive advertising: ANSWERV V |. There must be a representation, omission, or practice that is likely to mislead the consumer 2. The act or practice must be considered from the perspective of a reasonable person 3. The deception must be material MeNéeil v. Pfizer ANSWERV V A company launched an advertising campaign for Listerine Mouthwash, in which it was implied that listerine is as effective at fighting plaque and gingivitis as floss. A competing floss company sued for false advertising in violation of the Lanham act, and unfair competition in violation of state law. Judge recognized floss company's claim of literal falsity and on its implied falsity claim. In the end, Listerine ads could still use their studies to support the claim that their product fights plaque and gingivitis, as long as it does not invoke a comparison to floss (name the case) 4 areas of concern in deceptive advertising ANSWERV V 1. the use of mock-ups (fake versions of the product) in advertisements 2. substantiation of advertising claims 3. price claims and bait advertising 4. use of endorsements FTC on substantiation ANSWERV VJ Advertisers must have a reasonable-basis for the claims before including them in advertisements First amendment protection for advertising: ANS WERV V Used to be assumed ads didn't have Ist amendment protection, until the central hudson test