Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Impact of Emotion on Vivid Memories: Flashbulb Memory, Slides of Cognitive Psychology

The Flashbulb Memory theory, which explains how emotions influence the formation and retention of vivid memories of significant, emotionally charged events. Originally described by Brown and Kulik (1977), flashbulb memories are characterized by their exceptional vividness and resistance to forgetting over time. the typical characteristics of flashbulb memories, the biological mechanisms behind them, and the debates surrounding their distinctiveness from other memories.

What you will learn

  • What is the biological mechanism behind flashbulb memories?
  • How does emotion influence the formation and retention of flashbulb memories?
  • What are the typical characteristics of flashbulb memories?
  • What are flashbulb memories and how are they different from other memories?

Typology: Slides

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

faylin
faylin 🇺🇸

4.9

(8)

225 documents

1 / 11

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Flashbulb Memory
IB Syllabus Says:
Evaluate one theory of how emotion
may affect one cognitive process
(i.e. How flashbulb memory theory
explains the influence of emotion on
memory )
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Impact of Emotion on Vivid Memories: Flashbulb Memory and more Slides Cognitive Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

IB Syllabus Says: Evaluate one theory of how emotion may affect one cognitive process (i.e. How flashbulb memory theory explains the influence of emotion on memory )

  • Originally described by Brown & Kulik
  • Exceptionally vivid memories
  • Usually of important events with emotional significance
  • Resistant to forgetting over time
  • Debate centres on whether they are a

special case, or the same as other

memories

These are the aspects that Brown and Kulick (1977) propose are remembered vividly for flashbulb memories:

  • Where you were
  • What you were doing
  • How you were informed
  • How you reacted
  • How others around you reacted
  • They propose that there is a biological

memory mechanism which leads to

these exceptionally vivid memories

  • Surveys about dramatic events:
    • Brown & Kulik (1977) found US PPs tended to have vivid memories of political assassinations
    • All PPs good recall of Kennedy, Black PPs better recall of Medgar Evers (civil rights worker)
  • Shows importance of relevance of the

information – culture seems to influence things

  • Shock, arousal also important
  • Challenges to concept of FBM:
    • Neisser & Harsch (1992) compared PPs recall of Challenger disaster after 24 hours and 2 years
    • Found all accounts had changed over time, some were ‘wildly inaccurate’ 40%

• Furthermore, The McCloskey et

al. (1988) study also proposes

that flashbulb memories are not

special memories (see key

study)

  • Squire (2000) – recall of OJ Simpson

verdict

100%

50%

0% (^) 1 mo 12 mo 15 mo 3 years

Highly accurate Contained major distortions

Flashbulb memories

  • Relatively little evidence for FMBs as a

distinct memory process

  • They ‘feel’ accurate (we are confident in

recall) but are just as prone to forgetting

& change as other episodic memories