



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Notes; Professor: El-Shazly; Class: Petrology; Subject: Geology; University: Marshall ; Term: Unknown 2004;
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
El-Shazly, 2004 1
The classification of igneous rocks is not easy. This is simply because igneous rocks represent a continuum in nature (whether mineralogically or chemically), making their classification rather artificial. Nevertheless, classifications are needed to improve communication between scientists, and are generally of five different types: Mineralogical classifications: Are based on the mineralogical composition of the igneous rock, and the percentage by volume of essential minerals (minerals influencing its classification and constituting more than 5% of the rock). The volume % of any mineral is known as its mode. Obviously, in order to understand mineralogical classifications, we must know what kind of minerals occur in igneous rocks. Table 1 summarizes the most common igneous minerals and their chemical composition. Only rocks in which minerals can be identified in hand specimen and/or thin section can be classified mineralogically. Textural classifications: Textures are used as a secondary criterion for the classification of igneous rocks. For example, in the most commonly used mineralogical classifications of igneous rocks, textures are used to tell plutonic and hypabyssal rocks from volcanic ones. Each mineral assemblage will therefore correspond to two rock names: a plutonic one and its volcanic equivalent (see Streckeisen's classification below). On the other hand, textures are used as the only criterion for the classification of tuffs, ... but then again, these are sedimentary (pyroclastic) rocks! Chemical classifications: Are based on the chemical composition of the igneous rocks, and therefore require the availability of bulk rock chemical analyses (obtained by XRF, ICP or wet chemical techniques). These classifications are needed for many volcanic rocks that are either too fine-grained to allow for proper identification of their mineralogies, or which contain considerable amounts of glass. Genetic classifications: Although the ultimate aim of the petrologist is to understand how the rocks formed, genetic classifications are not very useful for the field geologist or petrographer who is just starting a study! Tectonic classifications: These are useful for understanding the relationship between plate tectonics and igneous activity, and rely heavily on studying present day igneous activity at different types of plate boundaries/ interiors. Making use of these classifications to understand the tectonic setting of "older" igneous rocks still requires chemical, mineralogical and textural data. Among these five different types, it is clear that the easiest are the mineralogical and textural classifications (as they require the minimum amount of information and usually only a petrographic microscope), followed by the chemical classifications which are necessary for many volcanic rocks.
El-Shazly, 2004 2 Mineralogical (± Textural?) classifications 1- Streckeisen's classification of plutonic igneous rocks: (Fig. 1): This is based on the relative modal abundance of the minerals: quartz (Q) - alkali feldspar (A; sum of K-spar
El-Shazly, 2004 4 This concept is based on comparing the mole proportions (mole proportion = weight% of oxide/molecular weight of this oxide) of the alkalis to alumina in a rock. Igneous rocks are subdivided into three groups according to this classification: Group Chemical characteristics Modal minerals Normative minerals^1 Peraluminous Al 2 O 3 > Na 2 O + K 2 O + CaO Corundum, Andalusite, Spessartine, almandine, Topaz, Muscovite, Tourmaline Corundum Metaluminous K 2 O + Na 2 O + CaO > Al 2 O 3
Na 2 O + K 2 O Feldspars + most Cpx An + Di Peralkaline K 2 O + Na 2 O > Al 2 O 3 Aegirine, Riebeckite, Arfvedsonite, Aenigmatite Aegirine (Ac), Na-metasilicate Most igneous rocks are metaluminous. Peraluminous rocks are almost always plutonic, whereas volcanic peralkaline rocks are more common than plutonic ones. 3- Total alkali - silica diagram: A simple plot of total alkalis (Na 2 O + K 2 O) vs. SiO 2 has been used to classify volcanic rocks. Figure 4 shows this classification. 4- CIPW norm calculations and classification: In 1902, Cross, Iddings, Pirsson and Washington, four American petrologists, devised a system for converting the chemical analysis of an igneous rock into a group of minerals predicted to crystallize from a magma of this composition. These predicted minerals (listed in table 3), are known as "normative minerals" and are represented in weight % to give the "norm of the rock" which should add up to ~ 100%. Normative calculations are based on the observed sequence of crystallization of minerals from a melt, and take into account which minerals can and cannot coexist in equilibrium. However, these calculations are based on the following assumptions (which are rarely true): 1- No hydroxyl bearing minerals exist in the rock (i.e. are calculated) 2- The norm is expressed in the form of end-members, and does not take into account many types of solid solution (e.g. Ti in pyroxenes, ... etc). 3- Pyroxenes and olivines are assumed to have the same Fe/Mg ratio. 4- Normative minerals are always formed (calculated) in the same order, regardless of the composition of the rock (or magma). (^1) See C.I.P.W classification below.
El-Shazly, 2004 5 Because of these assumptions, the normative mineralogy will almost always be different from the modal mineralogy of a rock. Nevertheless, the norm and mode of many basalts are often quite close, and normative calculations are generally useful for basic volcanic rocks. This is simply because basic magmas have less H 2 O compared to acidic ones, and these volatiles are themselves lost upon eruption, leaving behind mostly anhydrous minerals to crystallize from such lavas. Based on these norm calculations, Cross, Iddings, Pirsson and Washington proposed a classification of the different igneous rocks. However, this classification quickly became unpopular, and is seldom used. Nevertheless, normative calculations are still being widely used to quickly compare different rocks chemically. They are particularly useful for comparing different rock types that may have the same chemical composition (e.g. basalt, gabbro and eclogite). Norm calculations are also useful for classifying basalts (as we shall see later). Another example for the use of norms, if it is stated that a rock is olivine - normative, one quickly knows that it is not an oversaturated rock. An acmite-normative rock indicates that it probably crystallized from a peralkaline magma, ... and so on.