Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Scottsboro Boys: A Case Study in Racial Injustice and Legal Precedents, Lecture notes of Political history

A study of civil rights and civil liberties as a reference in the Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the United States.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Available from 10/28/2022

HOUSEMAN56
HOUSEMAN56 🇺🇸

51 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Oklahoma State University – Oklahoma City
Civil Rights and Liberties - POLS 1320
Winter 2022
Lecture Notes Twelve
Contents: Historical perspective of the Scottsboro Boys
Lecture Notes Twelve
The Scottsboro Boys were nine black teenagers falsely accused of raping two white women aboard a
train near Scottsboro, Alabama, in 1931. The trials and repeated retrials of the Scottsboro Boys sparked
an international uproar and produced two landmark U.S. Supreme Court verdicts, even as the
defendants were forced to spend years battling the courts and enduring the harsh conditions of the
Alabama prison system.
By the early 1930s, with the nation mired in the Great Depression, many unemployed Americans would
try and hitch rides aboard freight trains to move around the country searching for work.
On March 25, 1931, after a fight broke out on a Southern Railroad freight train in Jackson County,
Alabama, police arrested nine black youths, ranging in age from 13 to 19, on a minor charge. But when
deputies questioned two white women, Ruby Bates and Victoria Price, they accused the boys of raping
them while onboard the train.
The nine teenagers—Charlie Weems, Ozie Powell, Clarence Norris, Andrew and Leroy Wright, Olen
Montgomery, Willie Roberson, Haywood Patterson and Eugene Williams—were transferred to the local
county seat, Scottsboro, to await trial.
Only four of them had known each other before their arrest. As news spread of the alleged rape (a
highly inflammatory charge given the Jim Crow laws in the South), an angry white mob surrounded the
jail, leading the local sheriff to call in the Alabama National Guard to prevent a lynching.
The International Labor Defense (ILD), spearheaded a national campaign to help free the nine young
men, including rallies, speeches, parades and demonstrations. Letters streamed in from people—
Communists and non-Communists, white and black—protesting the guilty verdicts.
But in March 1932, the Alabama Supreme Court upheld the convictions of seven of the defendants; it
granted Williams a new trial, as he was a minor at the time of his conviction.
n November 1932, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Powell v. Alabama that the Scottsboro defendants
had been denied the right to counsel, which violated their right to due process under the 14th
Amendment.
The Supreme Court overturned the Alabama verdicts, setting an important legal precedent for enforcing
the right of African Americans to adequate counsel, and remanded the cases to the lower courts.

Partial preview of the text

Download The Scottsboro Boys: A Case Study in Racial Injustice and Legal Precedents and more Lecture notes Political history in PDF only on Docsity!

Oklahoma State University – Oklahoma City Civil Rights and Liberties - POLS 1320 Winter 2022 Lecture Notes Twelve Contents: Historical perspective of the Scottsboro Boys Lecture Notes Twelve The Scottsboro Boys were nine black teenagers falsely accused of raping two white women aboard a train near Scottsboro, Alabama, in 1931. The trials and repeated retrials of the Scottsboro Boys sparked an international uproar and produced two landmark U.S. Supreme Court verdicts, even as the defendants were forced to spend years battling the courts and enduring the harsh conditions of the Alabama prison system. By the early 1930s, with the nation mired in the Great Depression, many unemployed Americans would try and hitch rides aboard freight trains to move around the country searching for work. On March 25, 1931, after a fight broke out on a Southern Railroad freight train in Jackson County, Alabama, police arrested nine black youths, ranging in age from 13 to 19, on a minor charge. But when deputies questioned two white women, Ruby Bates and Victoria Price, they accused the boys of raping them while onboard the train. The nine teenagers—Charlie Weems, Ozie Powell, Clarence Norris, Andrew and Leroy Wright, Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson, Haywood Patterson and Eugene Williams—were transferred to the local county seat, Scottsboro, to await trial. Only four of them had known each other before their arrest. As news spread of the alleged rape (a highly inflammatory charge given the Jim Crow laws in the South), an angry white mob surrounded the jail, leading the local sheriff to call in the Alabama National Guard to prevent a lynching. The International Labor Defense (ILD), spearheaded a national campaign to help free the nine young men, including rallies, speeches, parades and demonstrations. Letters streamed in from people— Communists and non-Communists, white and black—protesting the guilty verdicts. But in March 1932, the Alabama Supreme Court upheld the convictions of seven of the defendants; it granted Williams a new trial, as he was a minor at the time of his conviction. n November 1932, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Powell v. Alabama that the Scottsboro defendants had been denied the right to counsel, which violated their right to due process under the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court overturned the Alabama verdicts, setting an important legal precedent for enforcing the right of African Americans to adequate counsel, and remanded the cases to the lower courts.