Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Sociocultural Anthropology: Loyalty, Affection, and Love in Social Structures - Prof. Erib, Study notes of Introduction to Cultural Anthropology

Lecture notes from a sociocultural anthropology course at davidson university in spring 2009. The notes cover topics such as loyalty and affection in different stages of life, social structure and its impact on cultural ideas, and the analysis of social networks as kinship systems. The document also introduces the concept of love and its various aspects, as discussed by helen fisher and carol stack. Students are encouraged to discuss questions related to these topics.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-g5j
koofers-user-g5j 🇺🇸

1

(1)

10 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ANT 101: Introduction to Sociocultural Anthropology
Spring 2009, M,W,F 10:30 — 11:20, Chambers 1027
Prof. Eriberto P. Lozada Jr. Office Hours: M, W 9:30– 10:30 am
Office: Chambers B12 T, Th 9:00– 10:00 am or by appointment
Telephone: 704-894-2035 Email: erlozada@davidson.edu
Web: http://www.davidson.edu/personal/erlozada
Lecture Notes, 11 February 2009
Questions for discussion:
From Wolf’s discussion of the uterine family and sim-pua marriage (and our discussion
of lineage dynamics), for both men and women in the life-cycle, where does loyalty and
affection lie? What are the key relationships in tension?
How do people maneuver within the system? How do changes in socio-economic system
play out in kinship?
Wolf’s argument is largely one based on social structure; the idea of the uterine family,
for example, shows how structure affects cultural ideas (such as gender relations);
Stack also has an analysis based on structure
But cultural ideas are also important; we often, for example, talk about the family and
ideas about “love” or “security”; can we find such concepts coming out of specific social
structures, or do these ideas give birth to social structure
What is Love?
Helen Fisher, Anatomy of Love: A Natural History of Mating, Marriage, and Why We Stray
Physical anthropologist who is looking at the intersection of physiological and cultural
sources of love; brain scanning, mapping out biochemical processes of people in love
divides love into three aspects: lust, associated with testosterone in men and women;
romantic love, associated in the brain with high levels of dopamine and norpenephrin
(natural stimulants) and low levels of seratonin (obsessive thinking); and attachment,
with vasopressin and oxytocin
Fisher, citing John Money: A love map: collection of preferences acquired over time as
a response to “family, friends, experiences, and chance associations” that serves as a
model for personal likes and dislikes. Preferred physical characteristics vary individually
and cross-culturally, but there may be some common traits that invoke sexual appeal
cross-culturally
Carol Stack’s “Domestic Networks”
Kinship system as social network
Social network analysis is a methodological approach that has been used extensively in
the social sciences; tends to be quantitative, although many have used social networks as
theoretical orientation to understanding social structure and social action
It essentially is a mapping out of individual social relationships; how ties are constructed
between nodes (individuals) is the key factor being studied; people connect to each other
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Sociocultural Anthropology: Loyalty, Affection, and Love in Social Structures - Prof. Erib and more Study notes Introduction to Cultural Anthropology in PDF only on Docsity!

ANT 101: Introduction to Sociocultural Anthropology

Spring 2009, M,W,F 10:30 — 11:20, Chambers 1027

Prof. Eriberto P. Lozada Jr. Office Hours: M, W 9:30– 10:30 am Office: Chambers B12 T, Th 9:00– 10:00 am or by appointment Telephone: 704-894-2035 Email: erlozada@davidson.edu Web: http://www.davidson.edu/personal/erlozada

Lecture Notes, 11 February 2009

Questions for discussion:

  • From Wolf’s discussion of the uterine family and sim-pua marriage (and our discussion of lineage dynamics), for both men and women in the life-cycle, where does loyalty and affection lie? What are the key relationships in tension?
  • How do people maneuver within the system? How do changes in socio-economic system play out in kinship?
  • Wolf’s argument is largely one based on social structure; the idea of the uterine family, for example, shows how structure affects cultural ideas (such as gender relations);
  • Stack also has an analysis based on structure
  • But cultural ideas are also important; we often, for example, talk about the family and ideas about “love” or “security”; can we find such concepts coming out of specific social structures, or do these ideas give birth to social structure
  • What is Love?

Helen Fisher, Anatomy of Love: A Natural History of Mating, Marriage, and Why We Stray

  • Physical anthropologist who is looking at the intersection of physiological and cultural sources of love; brain scanning, mapping out biochemical processes of people in love
  • divides love into three aspects: lust , associated with testosterone in men and women; romantic love , associated in the brain with high levels of dopamine and norpenephrin (natural stimulants) and low levels of seratonin (obsessive thinking); and attachment , with vasopressin and oxytocin
  • Fisher, citing John Money: A love map: collection of preferences acquired over time as a response to “family, friends, experiences, and chance associations” that serves as a model for personal likes and dislikes. Preferred physical characteristics vary individually and cross-culturally, but there may be some common traits that invoke sexual appeal cross-culturally

Carol Stack’s “Domestic Networks”

  • Kinship system as social network
  • Social network analysis is a methodological approach that has been used extensively in the social sciences; tends to be quantitative, although many have used social networks as theoretical orientation to understanding social structure and social action
  • It essentially is a mapping out of individual social relationships; how ties are constructed between nodes (individuals) is the key factor being studied; people connect to each other

in different ways, and there are different impacts to such relations; some ties bind, others do not

  • In social network analysis, the centrality of a node or the betweeness matters; the resulting map can be seen as a social structure
  • Kinship therefore is a social network, and the assumed tie is blood (or marriage); Stack’s approach re-examines kinship ties as not only blood , but as material support networks (people who are technically not kin become kin by providing mutual support)